Now, here is one tough question — What do you think about the SNAX reward algorithm? Why is it so tough?

Well, first, for me it is tough because it is not yet implemented at Steemit, and I don’t have (nor intend to have) Twitter account. At Steemit, we are getting this message only:

You havent-2019-05-22_204530.jpg

I’m a member of SNAX system since May 16th, and as you can see I have many posts since then, but the reward is still 0.

SNAX Whitepaper contain pretty detailed explanation, but since it has a great number of formulas, it must take much more than 24 hours to analyse everything. And then you have to have an example to check if the algorithm is properly implemented. SNAX principles are well formulated, but as in the case of Steemit, only the practical use can make a case for a sensible opinion.

I still cannot justify rewarding people using centralized social media. If cryptocurrencies are the best tool of restoring freedom, taking it back from the monstrous criminal surveillance & data harvesting FAANG conglomerate, then actually SNAX is going against the freedom by allowing sheeple to stay at their “favorite” jailhouse centralized media. And not only that — better “influence” position at centralized media (which can easily be faked) brings more reward! You can imagine fake accounts with fake followers that will be opened in the name of “your defenders” CIA, NSA, FBI… We already are witnesses of a large scale synchronized cross-platform censorship operations (here is one example). Are we going to support with SNAX that platforms?

That is much more important then bitching about a few formulas in the reward algorithm. It’s a question of morality. And survival in the extreme instance. Will anybody listen?

Until we see some rewards for Steemit posts…

https://snax.one/steem/lighteye

Snax with Steemit-2019-05-21_195114.jpg